Last updated: March 16, 2026

Select a security awareness training platform based on how well it handles async completion for global teams, includes phishing simulations with realistic scenarios, and provides compliance reports for audits. For remote teams, platforms that work offline and support multiple languages matter.

What IT Admins Need from Security Training Platforms

Remote teams face distinct security challenges that cloud-based training platforms must address. Your team members work from home networks, use personal devices, and rely heavily on digital communication—all vectors for phishing, social engineering, and credential compromise. The ideal platform provides:

Cost structure varies significantly: some platforms charge per-user annually, while others offer tiered pricing based on features. Most provide volume discounts for organizations over 100 users.

KnowBe4: The Enterprise Standard

KnowBe4 remains the dominant player in security awareness training, and for good reason. Its platform combines extensive content library with sophisticated phishing simulation capabilities that IT admins can customize for their organization’s specific threat profile.

Deployment for Remote Teams

KnowBe4’s cloud-based deployment works well for distributed teams. You assign training modules based on user groups, and the platform automatically tracks completion across locations. The KMSAT (Kevin Mitnick Security Awareness Training) module provides foundational content, while PhishER handles incident response workflow.

# KnowBe4 API: Export user training status
curl -X GET "https://us.api.knowbe4.com/v1/users" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \
  -H "Accept: application/json" | jq '.data[] | {name, email, status}'

Strengths

Considerations

Proofpoint Security Awareness: Integrated Threat Management

Proofpoint’s security awareness offering stands out for its integration with their broader security stack. If you’re already using Proofpoint for email protection, their training platform provides unified threat visibility across user behavior and email-borne risks.

Automated Workflows

The platform automatically adjusts training intensity based on user risk scores. High-risk users receive more frequent phishing simulations and targeted modules without manual intervention from IT admins.

# Proofpoint TAP API: Correlate training data with threat events
import requests

def get_user_risk_score(email):
    response = requests.get(
        f"https://tap-api.proofpoint.com/v2/user/{email}/risk",
        headers={"Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"}
    )
    return response.json()["riskScore"]

# Sync with training completion data for complete risk view
users_at_risk = [email for email in team_emails if get_user_risk_score(email) > 75]

Strengths

Considerations

CultureAMP: Developer-Friendly Experience

Originally known for performance management, CultureAMP has expanded into security training with a focus on engagement and completion rates. Their approach prioritizes short, digestible content that employees actually complete—addressing the common problem of training fatigue.

API-First Design

CultureAMP provides API access that developers appreciate. You can trigger training assignments based on events in your existing workflows:

// GitHub Actions: Assign security training on new repo access
async function assignTraining(userEmail, repoName) {
  const response = await fetch('https://api.cultureamp.com/v1/training/assign', {
    method: 'POST',
    headers: {
      'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.CULTUREAMP_API_KEY}`,
      'Content-Type': 'application/json'
    },
    body: JSON.stringify({
      user_email: userEmail,
      module: 'secure-coding-basics',
      due_days: 7,
      tags: [`repo:${repoName}`]
    })
  });
  return response.json();
}

Strengths

Considerations

Open-Source Options: KubeThought and SecurityShepherd

For organizations preferring self-hosted solutions or wanting to integrate training into existing infrastructure, open-source alternatives provide flexibility without licensing costs.

SecurityShepherd

Maintained by OWASP, SecurityShepherd offers web and mobile security training with customizable challenges. It’s particularly suitable for developer teams since content covers secure coding practices, not just general security awareness.

# Docker deployment for SecurityShepherd
version: '3'
services:
  shepherd:
    image: owasp/securityshepherd
    ports:
      - "8080:8080"
    environment:
      - DB_DRIVER=org.h2.Driver
      - DB_URL=jdbc:h2:file:./shepherd.db

Considerations

Comparative Analysis

Platform Best For Phishing Sim API Access Starting Price
KnowBe4 Enterprise scale Excellent REST API ~$3/user/month
Proofpoint Existing users Excellent REST API ~$5/user/month
CultureAMP Engagement focus Good GraphQL ~$4/user/month
SecurityShepherd Developer teams Basic No Free (self-hosted)

Implementation Recommendations

For most remote IT admin teams, KnowBe4 provides the most complete solution with minimal configuration overhead. Its automated assignment features handle distributed teams across time zones without manual tracking, and the phishing simulation templates cover scenarios relevant to remote work—video call hijacking, fake VPN alerts, and messaging platform phishing.

If your organization already invests in the Proofpoint ecosystem, their training platform adds significant value through unified threat data. The automatic risk-based training adjustment reduces manual workload while targeting resources where they’re most needed.

Smaller teams or those prioritizing developer experience should evaluate CultureAMP. The modern interface and strong completion metrics address the common problem of training that employees ignore or rush through.

Automating Training Workflows

Regardless of platform choice, automation reduces administrative burden. Common automations include:

# Example: GitHub Actions workflow for new contractor onboarding
name: Security Training Onboarding
on:
  pull_request:
    types: [opened]
    paths:
      - '.github/workflows/onboard-contractor.yml'

jobs:
  assign-training:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Extract contractor email
        run: |
          EMAIL=$(git log -1 --format=%ae)
          echo "contractor_email=$EMAIL" >> $GITHUB_ENV

      - name: Call training API
        run: |
          curl -X POST $TRAINING_API/assign \
            -H "Authorization: Bearer $API_KEY" \
            -d "email=${{ env.contractor_email }}"

Security awareness training for remote teams requires platforms that work as hard as your IT team does. The right choice depends on your existing infrastructure, team size, and how much automation you need to deploy effectively without constant manual oversight.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use the first tool and the second tool together?

Yes, many users run both tools simultaneously. the first tool and the second tool serve different strengths, so combining them can cover more use cases than relying on either one alone. Start with whichever matches your most frequent task, then add the other when you hit its limits.

Which is better for beginners, the first tool or the second tool?

It depends on your background. the first tool tends to work well if you prefer a guided experience, while the second tool gives more control for users comfortable with configuration. Try the free tier or trial of each before committing to a paid plan.

Is the first tool or the second tool more expensive?

Pricing varies by tier and usage patterns. Both offer free or trial options to start. Check their current pricing pages for the latest plans, since AI tool pricing changes frequently. Factor in your actual usage volume when comparing costs.

How often do the first tool and the second tool update their features?

Both tools release updates regularly, often monthly or more frequently. Feature sets and capabilities change fast in this space. Check each tool’s changelog or blog for the latest additions before making a decision based on any specific feature.

What happens to my data when using the first tool or the second tool?

Review each tool’s privacy policy and terms of service carefully. Most AI tools process your input on their servers, and policies on data retention and training usage vary. If you work with sensitive or proprietary content, look for options to opt out of data collection or use enterprise tiers with stronger privacy guarantees.